- Joined
- Sep 1, 2009
I have the 1999 game of the year version but it doesn't matter we know that they are about 300 or 400, the problem is that we don't know when SS occurs. 100 years before oot? 600 years before oot? No one knows for sure.
As long as he's not fat like he was in TP, I'm fine with Ganon being in SS.
Which makes me wonder, who is the chosen weilder of the ToP?
Which makes me wonder, who is the chosen weilder of the ToP?
The MS was made to fight of evil, not specificly Ganon. People always say the only sword that can kill Ganon is the MS. I am so tired ofpeople overlooking and ignoring everything that was in FSA. The FS is also Ganon's weakness! > .<'I don't know if anyone has said this already, but I think Gannon has to be in this game. Correct me if I'm wrong, The Skyward Sword is the Master Sword and the Master Sword is crafted to defeat Gannon. Meaning the Skyward Sword has to become the Master Sword in order to rid Hyrule of Gannon. This game is like the Origin of Link the Master Sword and anything we know about Zelda. So why not be the Origin of Gannon or even Evil for that matter.
Exactly. Logical connection of facts we know about the game clearly tells us we're not looking at a small amount of time prior to OoT. We're looking at many centuries. 1000 years seem like a minimum to me.IMO, ZSS is atleast a thousand years before OoT.
True. I don't think anyone's denying that. The problem is there are right ways and wrong ways to introduce a character in a story. With what seems to be going on with Skyward Sword's setting and story, it seems like they'd have to kind of force it if they were going to have Ganon appear. Since they would, I doubt it'll happen because it would hurt the storytelling.If Nintendo wants Ganondorf to appear, they can come up with a way to make him appear. He could find a way to travel back in time with the intent of destroying the Hero of Time's ancestor if Nintendo wanted him to.
The presence or absence of Moblins is irrelevant. They have no direct connections to any plot elements anymore.Well theres no moblins in the game- I think its bokoblins.
That theory is interesting, but unprovable. Since it's an outlandish new idea, it would still be forced if implemented into Skyward Sword.if Ganon and Ganondorf are the exact same person then why are there games where only Ganon appears? if they are the same person then both would appear together. but they don't always appear together. Ganon is in more games than Ganondorf. i know Ganondorf changes in Ganon but then he changes back. i have a theory for this. the fact the beast is just named ganon and the man is Ganondorf sounds like Ganondorf was named after Ganon. many people put endings or small changes when they name someone after someone or somthing else. many men are named after their fathers. also why give the beast a name most shape shifter's don't name the animal they change into. when link changes they call him link still. no name change. i think there was a man called Ganon first. he was the king of evil.he also was a shape shifter. he was defeated by link. weeks before he died he fathered one child. Ganondorf! i think when Ganon was dead Koume and Kotake resurected Ganon and housed him in Ganondorf. which is why Ganondorf is evil. and since this game is said to take place one hundred years before oot this is possible even plausible.
Language in the game, the way they refer to him, along with the stories about how a Gerudo King is born once every 100 years, etc... It all leads directly to the conclusion that he was 30-40 and was living a pretty normal human lifespan. There's nothing to suggest otherwise.well just because someone looks that age doesn't mean they are. i didn't say i wanted him i just put out a theory that was possible and somewhat logical.
They're twins. They're both the same age, so probably 300 based on their banter.Actualy, one says she was 300, and the other sayes she was 275. Not sure about the 275 one, but for sure the older one said 300. And there is no way ZSS is anywere close to 300 years before OoT. It has to be way more than that.
There has never been statements on WHY the Master Sword was created or how even how. Only that it is the Blade of Evil's Bane and has the power to defeat Ganon, not that it was created for that purpose.I don't know if anyone has said this already, but I think Ganon has to be in this game. Correct me if I'm wrong, The Skyward Sword is the Master Sword and the Master Sword is crafted to defeat Ganon. Meaning the Skyward Sword has to become the Master Sword in order to rid Hyrule of Ganon. This game is like the Origin of Link the Master Sword and anything we know about Zelda. So why not be the Origin of Ganon or even Evil for that matter.
Koume and Kotake are 300 years old. Also logical deduction based on facts we know about the story is that SS can only take place centuries before OoT. Twinrova and Ganondorf have likely not been born, and we might even be seeing Hyrule before the Gerudo.Ganon could be in this game in some type of form. He doesn't need to be the main villainous boss of the game. This game could and should explain a lot more of the Gerudo people and have his mother (Twinrova) be one of the antagonist of the game. But who knows, Twinrova is only 400yrs old, and who knows how long before Skyward Sword is of Ocarina of Time.
Someone with the personality of the Joker would be great.