When a new game comes out that we know nothing about we go into overdrive and come up with some weird, wild and wonderful stuff.
But with botw having a story expansion we're in a unique place where theory is concerned.
We know about BotW. We know its world, its characters and the status quo of the narrative. This gives us a construct, borders in which to work within for new theories.
So the question is this; do you prefer knowing nothing about the game and going wild with theory, or do you like having the restraints of what we know we can and cant do within the narrative now that we know the rules?
But with botw having a story expansion we're in a unique place where theory is concerned.
We know about BotW. We know its world, its characters and the status quo of the narrative. This gives us a construct, borders in which to work within for new theories.
So the question is this; do you prefer knowing nothing about the game and going wild with theory, or do you like having the restraints of what we know we can and cant do within the narrative now that we know the rules?
Last edited: