Ariel
Think for yourself.
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2010
- Location
- Sydney, Australia
really? in oot there are holes all over the game (in the ground) that you can go to and find stuff. there are mask lenders that tell you to go sell masks there are places to go in kakarikos village graveyard, bigorons sword, great fairys that lend you new magical attacks including but not limited to (Naarus Love) so as you can see you missed plenty in oot if you are saying that oot is not dense in quality and there isn't 2 things extra not including magic armor because you need that in the story it isn't extra
in (TP) that i am sure you can mention
Is that what you think than why is oot crowned the best zelda game in the series, some know it as the best game ever.
here are a couple sources for that comment: http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=239815 , http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/07/03/2051221
here are a couple saying that zelda TP is the worst zelda ever http://oreillywriter.com/gamefilter...-game-ever-legend-of-zelda-twilight-princess/ , and one comming straight from zelda universe: http://oreillywriter.com/gamefilter...-game-ever-legend-of-zelda-twilight-princess/
ignore the second link it is false
With this aside i am not saying that twighlight princess is a really bad game and a matter of fact i've beaten it twice what i am saying is that twighlight princess is nothing in comparison to oot and hardly deserves the title of zelda
i does, but hardly by a narrow margin
all this about twighlight being better than oot.... buffalo sh^t
Alright dude, that's nice. You have an arrogant tone, but your point is barely valid. This is not a "which is the better game thread" this is about the overworld. And here's another point you've missed, it's all opinion. You can't prove opinion, because there is no right answer. There is no "game formula" where you can quantitatively grade a game on its merit. Yes, your opinion can be backed up by other opinions, but they are also opinions. And if you're trying to prove that OoT is the highest rated game, no one's disagreeing with you. To say it IS the better game is unprovable. So you're arguing an unwinnable argument, against no body, in a completely irrelevant thread, and you've also managed to amke yourself look dickish. At least you've made some points about the OoT overworld, but thats sort of overshadowed by your statement that Twilight Princess doesn;t deserve to be a Zelda game. I would think Eiji Aonouma, Shigeru Miyamoto, the holders of the Legend Of Zelda copyright - Nintendo, those numerous sources you've just cited, this site, and most anyone that could read a game title, would disagree.
Enough of that now.
Does anyone else feel "crowded" in a Zelda game, when there is too much to do around you, always passing a potential sidequest thinking that you have to do that before the next dungeon or else you'll miss out on something? Anyone? I like the vast space like in Twilight Princess' Hyrule Field, but I need something to do also.
What if there were cyclical opportunities for sidequests in Skyward Sword, at least in one particular instance, say if some guy travelled into Hyrule periodically who could offer a sidequest or even just a piece of dialogue. It'd definitely make the game feel more alive. Or would that be to Pokemon-ish, RPG-like?