I like that, because normally it's the other way around; some reviewers gave Twilight Princess only a 9, because of "no voiceacting" + "no good graphics", while giving high graphic shootergames high scores, while these games are not so good at all, based on the gameplay aspect and the story aspect. Now, EDGE give SS a 10, while Uncharted 3 a 9, so that's a remarkable exception.
You will see that IGN, who just released their video review in which the guy almost orgasmed while he was giving the game perfect 10 because of the visuals solely, will give SS just a 9, because of things like "no voiceacting" + "No good graphics", just like they did with Twilight Princess (If they would have said awkward plot-twist + too easy, they would have had a point, but they didn't).
Aha! That's what I mean! A reviewer giving SS just a 9.3 because of "no voice acting" + "no good graphics". We will have a lot of those coming so be prepared.
Anyway, I like the fact that he didn't criticise the game for things like "bad dungeon design" or "awkward plot change", however I doubt a reviewer complaining about graphics and voice acting would actually be able to recognise bad dungeon design or bad plot changes.....