Also, I'd like to know what David's input is. He asked about seriousness and input, but didn't give any of his own, which is something that I find curious.
Yeah, I'm here. I've been keeping up. I'm coming. Just hold on.
Vote: AliT
Just in case you're the vig again
First off, probability of game set-ups, randomization, and other factors leave this reason pointless.
RNG chooses you!
Vote: A Link in Time
RNG...? I assume it has something to do with the bandwagon stage that day 1's have evolved into.
Vote: A Link In Time
Alit band wagon anyone?
So trying to poke fun at a bandwagon before he even gets on? Interesting. I get that it is day one, but like I said earlier, we have until
Sunday to pick someone to lynch, if we so choose. Bandwagoning is soooooo overrated.
Vote: A Link In Time
I feel like this is the only way we can prevent him from dying night one!
Again, another post on the bandwagon just to "prevent him from dying night one." Could someone tell me why this is an issue now in this game? I assume he's been killed many nights for his skill or something (which is honestly a bad scum move and ruins the fun that is Mafia).
Unvote
Vote: ALiT
#DayOneBandwagon
Again with poking fun at a bandwagon. I assume that scum all know who they are. Then again, this can be attributed to day 1 here on ZD.
ALIT needs to get five more votes in order to get lynched at all. I think he is pretty safe for now. Honestly though, it is quite rare to see any serious discussion whatsoever on day 1, and in many cases the person who ends up getting lynched is not obvious until the very end of the day (meaning that ALIT is not at all definitely getting lynched (even though he might hehe) in case that was what you were concerned with). ^^
But i like some serious discussion. I realize he isn't getting lynched yet, but that still doesn't excuse the fact that he's the one being bandwagoned up to this point. And as I mentioned, why him? Unless there is a plan to get rid of him right away in the shadows (which is a really bad move imo) it just doesn't make sense to me.
I'm going to kill off the weakest one by one.
That's super brash. I understand it was a joke, but still. *shudder*
Can tell you haven't been around for a while.
idk what it was like back in the day, but recent games have been pretty much nothing but RVS for the first day. In many of the games, the RVS actually ends up leading to serious discussion, and then serious stuff actually happens day 1.
Now, with that said, we shall carry on with the lynch of ALiT. He's been night 1 killed far too many times lately, so lynching him would prevent that!
Yet again maintaining the view that lynching him would prevent his death on night one, but then we lose a player. Why are we so keen on that? And yes, it has been a while since I've been on a Mafia game here. Also, RVS isn't exactly random as each vote is inherently chosen by the player who casts it (unless said player actually put a list in a random number sequencer and voted based on that). I just don't like it.
Why are people being serious already?
How else can we hunt scum? "Random voting" just puts people up for kill without anything to go on. Clues are present even in day one.
I'm not sure whether to laugh or shake my head sadly at everyone's responses to someone actually trying to be serious on day one. I'm not opposed to actually having some real discussion for once, though you're right that it doesn't happen very often.
That was, just, ugh. It doesn't happen very often because few people try. Why would you be sad about trying to move the game along? It makes no sense. There is a mafia (well, assuming the mod didn't follow my 3 mafia and 1 cult set-up from Star Trek Mafia a few years ago [boy was that a crazy game]) among us and we can at least get a better picture on how we can find them.
Now, there really isn't a lot to go off of, but we can keep our heads about us and at least try to move forward. Even without kills there is a lot to be done and a lot that we can actually do.
