This is something that I've had on my mind on and off since buying BotW's DLC, but what do you think of when extra aspects of a game's story are locked behind a DLC paywall, like the extra memories of the Champions' Ballad? Honestly, I really dislike when companies pull stuff like that, when the DLC contains elements related to the main story. Side stories I don't mind, since they're not essential to fully understand the main plot, but if the DLC is directly related to the story of the main game, I don't think I should have to buy it to complete what should have been in the original game in the first place.
Fire Emblem: Fates pulled something like this as well, since you wouldn't get the full experience (why would you want to) unless you bought the other routes separately as DLC content. Thankfully, Three Houses didn't follow this model, instead choosing to have all four routes in one release, and only releasing the optional side story DLC later.
What do you think about this? Do you think that it's wrong for companies to put content relating to the main story in DLC, or do you not mind either way?
Fire Emblem: Fates pulled something like this as well, since you wouldn't get the full experience (
What do you think about this? Do you think that it's wrong for companies to put content relating to the main story in DLC, or do you not mind either way?