I think I answered this in my response to Maniacal Engineer above.
Okay, wasn't sure if that counted or not since it was already part of a counter claim. Thanks for clarifying though!
I think I answered this in my response to Maniacal Engineer above.
After All Might 2.0's death, I feel like he was the Vigilante, but we can figure that out later.I do get why people aren't taking funnier's word on that. And I'm not completely trusting him either, but I am considering the possibility. Mostly because it came from funnier and I just don't think he would lie about that, even as SK. But I'll admit, I could be completely wrong. However, if that role is vig, they have been taking random shots, and that's not good for town. Sure they got lucky with a mafia kill n1, but then they ended up killing two townies n2 by hitting one of the lovers.
Actually, I think that was mostly me drawing the connection between Pika and All Might as a potential theory to explain the events of N3. Obviously it was at least partially wrong, but it was still worth considering at the time.I agree that it seems like it might have been done to make Bok look bad. It would've made a little more sense if Bok had done it (though it was a bit rash and came out of nowhere, so that's why I didn't automatically assume he did it), since Krow was throwing suspicion on both Pika and All Might, implying they were possible scumbuds. And All Might's flip in the middle of that cleared up that connection. Which kinda makes Krow look a little worse imo, since it looks like he was just throwing out accusations in an attempt to make himself look better.
This is fair, I actually did miss that he asked about Roleblockers blocking kills before his post where he voted Darth. However, this could very well also be opportunistic scum finding a way to use the lack of NK to their advantage to gain Town cred. There is still no evidence that a Roleblocker is causing the lack of kills, and, depending on who scum chose to kill N2, they could have hit a Bulletproof.I mentioned it in one of my posts before, but he did ask if roleblocker blocked kills on here and then after that was when he placed his vote on Darth and said it was due to his role. That to me seemed like he had blocked Darth, saw people talking about the possibility of no kills because mafia was roleblocked, realized that he had potentially blocked mafia and perhaps was the reason there was no kill, and then used that info to vote for Darth. That also kinda explains why he said he only had evidence/confirmation that he blocks kills because Darth flipped scum. Because he seemed unsure if his role had that ability, but once Darth did actually flip scum, then it sorta confirmed for him that it was possible for him to block kills. Him saying he was suspicious of Darth because of his night actions after all the talk about lack of kills because of a roleblocker makes complete sense.
Technically, he never did, ME1 did and he confirmed it. I quoted both relevant posts in my previous post.Would you mind pointing out where he answered it, because I must have missed that. Never saw him state the exact results he got.
I kinda doubt that All Might would have done something like that without at least hinting towards it first.Nobody has yet brought up the possibility of All Might having been a Desperado. Considering he died during the day, and then what he said afterwards, I think that's very possible. I can't think of many other roles that are able to kill during the day.
Actually, I think that was mostly me drawing the connection between Pika and All Might as a potential theory to explain the events of N3. Obviously it was at least partially wrong, but it was still worth considering at the time.
This is fair, I actually did miss that he asked about Roleblockers blocking kills before his post where he voted Darth. However, this could very well also be opportunistic scum finding a way to use the lack of NK to their advantage to gain Town cred. There is still no evidence that a Roleblocker is causing the lack of kills, and, depending on who scum chose to kill N2, they could have hit a Bulletproof.
Technically, he never did, ME1 did and he confirmed it. I quoted both relevant posts in my previous post.
I kinda doubt that All Might would have done something like that without at least hinting towards it first.
Pretty sure saying: "I'm going to use my action on Krow, if I die, he's Town," doesn't actually count as roleclaiming, though I could be wrong on that front.
As for his statement afterward, it makes me believe moreso that someone used an ability on him, not vice versa.
The only possible way I think this can line up is if he was 100% sure Krow was scum, and figured he would live to tell the tale after submitting his action. Even so, not saying anything beforehand is kinda a dumb move all around, since, on the offhand chance he was wrong, he'd be dead and Town would have no explanation whatsoever.
I think moreso, as I said above, he was the Vigilante. Plus, the flavor doesn't imply any sort of confrontation whatsoever, and I know that y'all are big into revealing details in the FT, as opposed to full role flips
I have a theory on this. Take this as objectively as possible, but look at the "role titles" for Mighty Engineer.It's also true that there's not proof that the roleblocker is causing the lack of kills, but it's possible that it is. There was a lack of 2 kills n2, so one could be attributed to someone being bulletproof and one could be contributed to roleblocker. And like I've said, funnier claimed to target Krow n2, and he didn't die, so that accounts for one missing death.
I have a theory on this. Take this as objectively as possible, but look at the "role titles" for Mighty Engineer.
"Immortal Lover"
Well, we know what the Lover bit was, since ME2,1 committed suicide when All Might was killed N2, but what about the "Immortal" bit? Clearly neither of them were truly immortal, since they both died, so what could it mean?
Well, take a look at ME2,1's playstyle on D1. It was very laid back, very non-committal, and it seemed like he was trying to stay off the radar. Most unlike him, but it makes sense. His usual "fatalistic" playstyle would result in the death of a second townie, which would hardly be ideal, especially since, as of D1, it hadn't been established how many killing roles there were.
Take a look at D2, though. A lot more confidence showing through, a full and detailed reads list, even a bit of excessive banter about Batman and a few "false trail" softclaims with a real softclaim buried in there. Considerably more like his usual playstyle. What's the difference? Why so tentative on D1 and more bold on D2? Did it seem like, maybe, he was trying to bait a kill? But why? Why would he do that, if it meant the death of another townie?
Perhaps it has something to do with the "Immortal" part of that role? Something that may not have been mentioned in the FT, since he ended up dying anyway due to All Might being targeted.
Interesting...not going to confirm or deny this, but if All Might was giving information about his previous role, perhaps his death was a modkill and not a specific role in the game. Certainly explains the odd flavor.Oh yeah, All Might did mention something about your original role being bulletproof. Though Bok said he blocked you n2. Don't know if that would block your bulletproof or not as well.
So your result was "No result?"
What was your exact result on Pika?