Search results for query: *

lol i coudl swear i just explained why. because they had the WW stuff right in front of them. i would bet money that they were making MC while they were making WW and WW was just closer to being done so it came out first. if they make the game at the same time, it would be much more conveniant...

you do know that both of these games came out withint like one or two years of each other, right? now lets see what kind of things they reused in MC from WW. they reused the toon link idea. they reused the design of the NPCs. they reused monsters. OMG THEY REUSED THE HYLIAN TEXT TOO!? that must...

there is actually quite a bit of evidence for it to go first, you just dont want to believe it so you dont even consider it. now see the whole TP not mentioning Vaati and MC not mentioning Ganondorf thing is not the same thing. my point is that the whole reason there is a new Hyrule is because...

MC was created AFTER WW. in MC there is absolutely no mention of a flooding, great sea or deflooding or anything of the sort. there is also no mention of a previous Hyrule. there is no mention of Link and Tetra who would be the founders (according to your timeline). there is no mention of...