Search results for query: *

:notzd: ^In many ways, I'd argue, that when they say "Link represents the player" they don't mean he represents you visually, but rather he represents you in terms of actions and in terms of being the physical "Link" between the player and Hyrule. I also feel like the same mentality is at play...

Again, I do not see how there being multiple incarnations of Link means anything. The "reincarnation" in Zelda is not a plot point, hell it's not even confirmed to exist, it's a means to an end, that end being the excuse to have the same group of characters over and over and over, it's the same...

I could settle for a twin sister, though I'd prefer it just be a regular sister, or just another hero who happens to be a girl, who doesn't look like Link and has her own unique design. In a world where there are apparently no sociological differences between gay and straight people, or black...

Honestly, I still feel like the solution to all this is to just create a new character, someone who can essentially be a fem Link in spirit, without actually being a fem Link; hell at this point even though I don't like it I'd except something like Linkle, assuming she was canonically his...

^Depends on what you mean by "female character." I'd love a nonLink playable female, I'd stop playing Zelda altogether if we got a female Link.

^I'm still not sure if the option is worse or if the female incarnation is worse. Really though, I think they should just not do anything fem Link related, PCism or not, no sense in changing an iconic character, when there's already a billion and one female characters to pick from, and plenty...

I have a hard time imagining any story where any character couldn't actually be any gender, especially if you're already changing the dialogue. Likewise, I wouldn't consider the consistent design of a character inconsequential, but that's just me. Similarly, I think in terms of looking back...

@Truffles I'd probably be pretty pissed even if the idea wasn't forced, link is a huge part of Zelda to me, and how he's handled in the future can easily make or break the entirety of the series to me, I don't want him changed and since I don't view him as a avatar I also don't want him...

Lol, I'm sorry I can't tell peoples tone on the internet, it's a weakness! :( @Thread Also, while we're at it, ww does sorta imply that there might be some genderedness to the reincarnation, as instead of simply looking for an heir to the Hylian royal line, Ganon was searching for girls...

I'm pretty sure they confirmed in HH or around the time of SS' s release that Geapora wasn't actually Keapora Geabora. And, I don't think he was ever confirmed to be Rauru. Even then...I don't know if it's reincarnation so much as a physical representation of the remains of his soul which...

@Sarah Ganondorf the person reincarnated in FSA, as a gerudo male who betrayed the gerudo, I'm not saying there's anythin g in writing that says he has to be this way, merely that, despite being a different person, the similarities were insane, all the way down to even apparently having the...

^Why shouldn't what the character is or isn't matter to peoples? It's their experience with the game, and everything or anything can effect that experience. Likewise, I fail to see the argument of Link being multiple as holding any water, sure there's nothing that states Link has to be a boy...

Well, this is a no joking zone! >:( :P

I'm Bi, either way I wouldn't look at anything as I wouldn't buy a zelda game where Link is changed, he's a blond, blue eyed, whire hylian boy, in a green tunic, anything else wouldn't be/isn't link, aol link doesn't count as he's the same incarnation from TLoZ who's blond at least ambiguously...

Only if it's not Link, I don't want the option and I don't want a female incarnation, you don't just change an iconic character after thirty years because of typical sjw nonsense.