Search results for query: *

No sir. Let's use Ky as an example here, since we're jacking his thread. He used to make signature images in gimp, which honestly, is not so great, and they always ended up looking... not good. That is because gimp lacks the luxury features that Photoshop has. Sure, great work can be done with...

The point is still there. There's some kind of magical force behind it that just allows people to produce quality pieces.

See, I told you. I've been saying it all along. Before when you made sigs, they were piles of crap. Now you got Photoshop and these are excellent. This furthers my argument that Photoshop automatically makes people better at graphic design.