Search results for query: *

No that is not my theory it is a linearist theory to try to dispell the idea of a split timeline which I obviously believe in as my theory is a split timeline. Sorry I was just looking at my timeline and not the bit I put direct sequels at the bottom now I understand that was just a mistake no...

That was the idea of the linearist theory Darklink as it wouldnt work so there cant be a split timelime, the triforce is a lower tier evidence for me like geography (unless its obvious i.e. great sea) I think that might have been when you edited my timeline for your preferance (its okay...

sorry Erimgard I didnt see this had been replied to I cant remember exactly but the theory is that when Link is sent back in time he takes the ToC with him meaning there is no ToC on the AT so nobody can obtain the ToC, something like that. I dont personally believe that FS is a direct...

Ok so Ive been through Dark Link's timeline construction and have changed it accordingly ------AT------ (FPTRR) -- WW/PH -- ST MC -- FS -- OOT ------CT------ /MM -- TP/(LCT) -- FSA -- ALttP (GBA)/LA -/- OOX -- LoZ/AoL - next game -/- Interchangable and may be generational (---) Spin Off so may...

Yeah I was going to put up a full explanation but Im too tired "Why are FS and FSA not near each other on the timeline?" Because I dont believe that FSA is a direct sequel to FS as no length of time is given between when Vaati is sealed for the second time (FS) and escaping from the seal...

Ok, Ive been thinking about this a lot and I know its a bit off but thats why Im posting it, to get some constructive critiscm. Theory 1 ------CT------ MM - TP - (LCT) - FSA - ALttP (GBA) - LA-/-OOX - LoZ - AoL MC - FS - OOT ------AT------ (FPTRR) - WW - (TBFDS) - PH - ST - next game -/-...