Search results for query: *

That future depended on Link being there to create it, and in order for it to be maintained, the paradox would have to be resolved with the sealing of Ganon. That doesn't add up though. How could Link ever exist in the future if he didn't have any decendants or if his legend never happened to...

Hyrule A was merely 7 years behind with the same events set in motion, so I don't see it as being anything different. It still would create a paradox, so the split wouldn't be able to go there.

There are only a few games I havn't beaten in the series: Adventure of Link Oracle of Seasons/Ages Link's Awakening Phantom Hourglass And I want you to take some time to read the opening post, I think I clarify my position a lot better now, I amended it in a way that will hopefully actually...

That's quite the claim. It's unfortunately demolished though, thanks to the mountains of logical evidence in support of my theory. My theory is logically sound and has a factual premise, is it possible that you simply don't understand it?

It's a logical inconsistancy. It indicates that the games are not matching up the way that they should. And if they don't add up, my theory on the timeline is correct. They don't add up. My theory is correct.

I address that a bit with this post, I'd recommend you read the whole thing but this scratches the surface of the theory.

That doesn't account for the missing items though, Link still ought to have the full inventory that he had when you beat WW. It depends on the state of the Temple of Time when Link got sent back. Link was sent back to the Temple but that means that since the doors were open, it was back to...

Ganondorf did go in though, he said that he had followed you the whole time and he was suspecting you. Majora's Mask and Ocarina happened at the same time. Majora's mask happened with child link, and with the Ocarina of time, therefore it had to have happened within Ocarina of Time. It is not...

Yes, that's true. If MM is a chronological sequel than it violates the time paradox and the split timeline theory has failed. Did it say in Majora's Mask that Link was looking for Navi? I thought he was looking for "an old friend" that people presumed to be Navi. I'd like to see some sources...

"Common sense" is oftentimes wrong and relies heavily on assumption. In order to logically construct ideas, you can not simply rely on it alone.

I'm simply saying that it is impossible to produce a clear timeline because the story depends heavily on impossibilities due to failures when the plots of games don't adhere to the chronological order that Miyamoto and Nintendo claim. This does not account for Twilight Princess. I've...

I understand time paradoxes and stuff, it's interesting material for me, and one is created here. I offered a brief commentary(I may try to restate my ideas and go further in depth there later). However it is not an assumption that time could not go forward, unless multiple realities are...

You fail, because Ocarina of Time creates a time paradox, meaning that it would be a never ending loop. Therefore MM would have to occur within this loop, and it might be a "sequel" because it came out after Ocarina of Time, but in no other ways than Twilight Princess is a sequel to Wind Waker...

And yet they are looking for a ghost ship, which you allready got the treasure from. Nice try, but that shows the timelines don't match up. And Avenged, I'd like to note some other inconsistancies, referring to MM and OoT. One being that Child link can not ride child Epona in OoT, and there...

Can you link me to evidence please?

OMFG FALMEZ ARENT ALLOWED QUIT FLAMN ME PLZZZZZZZZ But really, I think you'll find that the storylines contradict themselves too much for them to be connected outside of a very, very loose sense. A sense of which there is no order whatsoever. They are just parodies of other stories, and...

No that's actually on topic, because it defends my theory with counter evidence. We also know that Gorons do not need to breathe for extended periods of time because of that. So I'd say that throws the extinction theory out the window.

And? It doesn't really matter because it shows that the plot is using whatever the programers find convenient, it has nothing to do with a timeline. The Gorons lived on the top of the largest peak, Death Mountain. They would have easily found shelter.

Then why would only two temples exist? And why would they have changed names? Also, why were the gorons displaced? It just doesn't add up.

Myamoto is a liar then, because the Ocarina of Time doesn't match up with Wind Waker, and none of the other dungeons from the other games maintain that consistancy. There are only two temples in Wind Waker and yet there are 6, 4, 7, or 8 in the other games. It doesn't add up.

My Timeline Theory: First some brief tidbits of Information before I explain: http://i336.photobucket.com/albums/n329/inflexus/inflexustheory.png http://i336.photobucket.com/albums/n329/inflexus/inflexuscompartments.png Now I want to argue that the timeline itself is like a child's...