Search results for query: *

Yes, that was clearly stated in Wind Waker when they were introduced, I believe. Both groups were referred to as "forest children". And at you, Blackice, that was the explanation I believe. It is the most rational and it isn't any kind of stretch to believe it. However the Koroks can freely...

You can stay looking like you're 8 years old and die too. And if I recall, the forest was on level ground, not a cave in a mountainside. I thought the gods would have recreated the race in a new way and/or forced an evolution, but transplanted the Deku tree. A lot doesn't add up though, it's...

Who ever said kikori were immortal?

And because of this, the most rational explanation must be incorrect, right?

How would natrual selection over the course of 100 years have a negative effect on a species? Your logic is faulty, if you don't mind me saying so.

I would have thought that the korok were an evolution because WindWaker would be forced to come after all the other games because the land of Hyrule has been destroyed. Which means the Korok > Kokori, so the thread has a flawed premise.

Yeah, I think Zelda can trancend science. Seriously, right? ;)

Koroks were an evolution of Kokori, therefore it would have taken several thousands of deaths to produce them. None would necessaraly have to match personality types, as these would have been wiped away with DNA over the course of thousands of years.