Search results for query: *

I think, by the same logic, maybe he just took the bracelet off when he went back? Like, he still had it. It just wasn't physically on his wrist. 1. Link is born 2. Link gets the Kokiri Emerald 3. Link meets with Zelda 4. Link gets the Goron Ruby 5. Link gets the Zora Sapphire 6. Link sees...

This makes sense conceptually. So does the other split. I just think it's stupid and bad and dumb and wrong. What happens after Hyrule is destroyed in all of the other timelines? Something. Something is after all those other timelines. So to single out this one is to ignore all of the other...

I thought I should address this separately. To me, the timeline is stupid and the Living Legend Theory is the accurate one. Story is last, Nintendo doesn't care, yada yada, I agree with you, you are correct. But if we're going to play in the space where things in fictional universes matter...

Why wouldn't the celebration make sense. The Hero of Time just defeated Ganondorf 7 years after he took over the kingdom, and so everyone celebrates in the future. Meanwhile, the same Link, after being sent back in time to the beginning of OoT, no celebration is happening because the events of...

I think then my question is, if CT OoT Link decided to go into the future after having "saved Hyrule," could he have gone to the Wind Waker timeline? No, he would have gone to Twilight Princess. Right? I just disagree with that. The people in the Wind Waker are waiting for the Hero of Time to...

Who did that? Zelda? Is that something the Ocarina can do? Who took sleeping Kokiri Forest Link, teleported his body, erased his consciousness, and gave him the Triforce? Past Link is on his way to Dodongo Cavern. It's why he doesn't have the bracelet. It's why Impa isn't standing in front of...

Didn't know that, thanks. Sorry for the spam. I made a new thread because the guidelines said that if you had your own timeline theory, don't clog a thread that is related to the canon timeline. I think we're saying the same thing. The past, future and present are all happening at the same...

But how did the first conflicting thing happen if the second didn't in the same universe? Are you saying that the Child part of Ocarina of Time that happens after he goes back in time to do the Bottom of the Well, happens in a separate universe than both the child and adult timelines? Because...

Because the hero was in Termina, in an endless time loop, for like a ton of time. Link was stuck in Termina for three days Termina-time, but we don't know how long he was there in Hyrule-time. Long enough for the Triforce of Courage that he had to break after it couldn't find a wielder in...

"In the land of Hyrule, there echoes a legend. A legend held dearly by the Royal Family that tells of a boy...A boy who, after battling evil and saving Hyrule, crept away from the land that had made him a legend...Done with the battles he once waged across time, he embarked on a journey. A...

OOT is the car crash. Link going back to the start of OOT at the end of OOT is him going back to the same universe that the game happened in. The same universe the car crash happened in. It's the same timeline. He has no free will and whatever happens after Zelda sends him back is what happened...

But the paradox still exists in the original game. According to you, Canon Ocarina of Time and the entire Adult Branch that follows it, can't exist because there is a paradox in the game. The only way to remedy that is to have Ocarina of Time never happen (the canon ending being the prologue to...

Maybe it's an issue with media generally. I personally don't think that, if you are a time traveler, you have free will (like in Harry Potter). If you are living, and you, like, get hit by a car or something. And then you're like "I can just time travel back and not save myself from being hit by...

That's my point. He couldn't have killed his mother because he has already lived the future in which he didn't kill his mother. Same with the Song of Storms. The windmill guy has only heard the song from the Hero of Time as a child because he knows it in the future. It's all bound to one...

The only connections between OOT and TP is the Hero's Shade being the Hero of Time (assuming that the Civil War mentioned in TP is a new event resulting from the resurrection of Ganon through Zant's worship). This means it could take place at any point after the Interloper War and after Ocarina...

My thing is the other two timelines don't exist. It's just the one. If Link dies in Four Swords, it doesn't make a new timeline because that isn't how time works and also, any individuals player's death isn't canon. It's the same thing in Ocarina of TIme; if Link dies, that's not the canon...

Wait, how? I just explained why there physically couldn't be a timeline split. In all three timelines, the exact events of Ocarina of TIme have to play out. But that's not the case in the timeline current. Only in the Adult TImeline do the events of Ocarina of Time happen. Which means that the...

he's beautiful.

It's a very complicated, and also pointless, distinction, but people are theorizing about where BOTW goes, and that it's a convergence, but my point is there never was a divergence. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_travel#General_relativity In time, you cannot change the past. You can create...

So, at the end of The Wind Waker, Daphnes wishes to "Erase Hyrule" and for "Hope!" for the future (according to the Japanese.) However, while Hyrule is washed away, it isn't erased. The land they find includes the spirits of the sages from OOT, it includes Link, Zelda, Hyrule Castle, The Demon...

Linear timelines are dead, and yet I'm still a linearist. Splitists are wrong because that's not how time works. SS-->OOT-->MM-->TWW-->PH-->ST-->TMC-->FS-->FSA-->ALTTP-->OOA-->OOS-->LA-->ALBW-->TFH-->TP-->Z1-->Z2-->BOTW Any questions? Also, this timeline has only one Ganon/Ganondorf across all...