Search results for query: *

I know From what a lot of people understand and from Game Theory is that we have Universe A where we have the Adult and Child Timeline and Universe B where Link died. What I'm trying to prove that it's also possible that we have one Universe with 3 simultaneous timelines existing.

The entire series is a Universe

But their is a difference between Timeline and Universe. When you something like toying with time itself this cause a New Timeline. When you apply the Decision Making Theory, a decision you make could make a New Universe. In this case it says Timeline.

Look as we see it now the Declined Timeline is made by a decision Link made which killed him. This part of the many-worlds interpretations theory of decision making. Problem is the Timeline it's a Timeline and NOT an Altenate Universe so the decision making theory is immediately thrown out the...

Yes you can every universe is independent from one another in both time in space. Although we don't know in real life if two separate events can happen consecutively. A Timeline does not create a Universe.

Everything exited in one Universe and a time split happened in that universe.

No you don't You have one universe with a single linear timeline from SS to OoT. In that Universe you had 3 time splits which created 3 Timelines in that Universe both coexisting. That is the multiverse theory.

Every Timeline is part of a Universe. But different Universe's Timeline cannot interact with one another.

You don't understand what a Timeline and universe are.

No every Universe has their own timelines. But's not the way around. The Zelda universe contains 3 timelines.

It's not an Alternate Universe. Nintendo says it's a Timeline. Meaning Mat Pat's Theory can't be right meaning it has to exist somehow. By either it creating the Adult Timeline or it being created by the other two timelines.

It's the least likely of places to be 100 years after OoT. First of all sure Link was resurrected but it can't be the same Link. This Link has long brown hair and is right handed while the Link in OoT has shorter blond hair and is left handed. Second Ganon was sealed twice. Once after he got the...

As far as we know he have no confirmation on the timeline placement for Breath of the Wild. Although we have some clues I'll give out my two ideas. But first I'll talk about theories circulating online and why they may be wrong: Probably wrong: Taking place many years after Wind Waker and...

In one timeline may exist many various alternate and parallel worlds(dimensions, universe, etc). If you go to another timeline these worlds still exist but they may be different because of the timeline. -For example we have Termina and Lorule which are Parallel Worlds. They are usually created...

Makes sense. Why did we have to know this anyway?

You may be right about that. But who mentions this? I'm pretty sure someone at some point says to go look for something in Lake Hylia.

Basically yes. Since it existed in both the future and past it created two different Timelines. That would be a logical explanation. Doesn't Saria hint you where to go when you play Saria's Song?

At the small second where he ended it up in the past immediately created a new Timeline since he appeared at the Pedestal of Time and it couldn't have been moments before pulling the sword because we see Link re-meeting Zelda for the first time. Most logical moment this all happened was before...

Their's nothing to accept. Their's a huge difference between Alternate Universe and Alternate Timeline which is already said by science. And since Nintendo confirmed all 3 are timelines then that means they are.

Nope you still don't understand the difference between a Timeline and an Alternate Universe. During the Adult Timeline the moment where Link was sent back in time. And the new events caused by Link is what makes it an Alternate Timeline. It's not an Alternate Universe. That's the problem...

No. HH states Link died at Ganon's hands during the final battle. So we have to assume the vent which lead to Link's death were almost the same as OoT we all know with a few minor differences. Perhaps my theory is wrong but one thing is for certain is that someone after Link's death changed...

That's the problem. If we say Link just fell in battle it has to be cause by something we didn't experience in OoT and which the version of the story we experienced in OoT is the actual Child Timeline. Or else that would make it an Alterante Universe rather than a Timeline meaning HH was wrong...

Sure I'll do it latter Basically since a Timeline needs to be either an original one or be a new one altered by a time traveling "agent". Through manner of deduction I fihured it might be that mysterious bottle that we don't know who wrote it which its non-exitence would lead to Link never...

yes I just did a few times. It doesn't seem like we have a contradiction.

No the fact Link was sent back in time created a new timeline. To begin with he was sent back to an unkown specific time in the past before Zelda ran away and most likely before any of the bad stuff happened with Link having posetion of all his items and the spiritual stones. You know how we...

-Why not? We did see the Adult Timeline still existing even if Link created the Child Timeline. So the Downfall Timeline could still cooexist with the other two timelines even if a new one was created. -Zelda did the same in Adult Timeline. Sure Link went back in time but Ganon still made hell...

Which is?

That was basically it.

Well it didn't benefit the Adult Timeline either when Link was sent back in time.

It did change something. True Ganon still got the Triforce of Power and wasn't killed but Link still won it wasn't until the Child Timeline that things got better.

If you shoot an Arrow at Sakon in Majora's Mask after he steals from the old lady he blows up.

Link: -Stole people's soul using masks -Is cruel to animals -Steals money from houses -Cheats on Zelda during many occasions -Deforested the entire land of Hyrule (after Skyward Sword) -Followed his Uncle even if he said not to -Broke people from jails many times -Sleeps too much...

The downfall timeline would still exist since we did see that the Adult Timeline still remained after Link went back in time.

That could be a possibility. Like I said it could of been either that or maybe an actual forgery from the future.

As I said if Ruto did not lie than it's possible someone forged it. Probably not Ganon since his motives for doing so would be pretty weird. So if as I said it was from the future it could have been maybe done by someone from the future forging it or Adult Ruto writing it.

Here's the problem in order for the Declined Timeline to be an actual Timeline and not an Alternate Universe someone from the future had to do change something in the past in order for the other Timelines to take place. Maybe their's another theory about how this might of happened but this one...

It's not certain. It was NEVER confirmed.

You don't get it do you. When someone makes a theory and someone wants to prove it wrong he cannot use another theory. Only facts. Whatever I said doesn't matter because it's a part of my theory while someone must use facts to disprove it. I said it's a temporal agent because their has to be...

Also for what I said before. The arguments you guys made can't be a theory. For example lets take the "Link is dead" theory. What if someone tries to make an argument and the argument is that the Hero's Bow from MM is the same as the Hero's Bow from TP. That argument has evidence pointing...

Also to anyone wondering I decided to name the theory. A Bottle in Time XD

True but in both the ALttP manual and in Ocarina of Time in both cases Ganondorf still got to the sacred realm regardless if Link helped him or not. In both scenarios he gets hold of Triforce which would suddenly split and give 1/3rd to Link, Zelda and Ganon.

How is HH's prouven wrong? Their's no contradiction in what I said I followed it from beginning to end. As I said HH has no contradiction with ALttP's manual which stated ganon opened it somehow. Find me a damn link or quote and I'll admit I'm wrong because I double checked my sources from the...

Let Link do the heavy lifting? You do realise that the bottle thing was before Zelda disappeared? And if the bottle left Jabu Jabu's body shouldn't the Sapphire also leave as well? Ganon had no knoledge of Link to my knoledge so leaving a forged note in a bottle in the most obscure location is...

No he theorises Ruto was still the person who wrote the letter and is just ashamed of admitting it. Whic is only a theory because it's not stated anywhere. He din't copy it word for word that's why I'm asking a quote or link to a page.

Unless a fact was stated you can't justify something with a theory. I re-read a thousand times in past few hours and found no such thing. No that's the problem MatPat was right by word definition. I am trying to prove this is actually a Timeline. Just watch his video. Prove me with a quote...

Forging a letter is really easy and Ruto could have made it herself in the future. Right now your argument is using a theroy. You cannot argue like that. The silent and sacred realm have never been confirmed to be the same.

You are currently trying to prove something with a theory. I don't care what was written or not it was NEVER proven who wrote it so you can't justify an argument with a theory. Give me a link because to my knowledge HH never talked much in detail about Link's death. No because it looses...

The Sacred Realm and Hidden Realm are not the same thing. It's never been confirmed.

I know. But naturally the Sacred Realm and Master Sword had no connection. The connection was only made latter after the events of SS by magic.

First of all the Master sword and Sacred Realm no longer had a connection in ALttP so you're wrong their. Second perhaps it was re-forged in the war maybe that's how Ganon made into the Sacred Realm by braking it after all we did see in the Wind Waker how it lost all power plus it would make...