• Welcome to ZD Forums! You must create an account and log in to see and participate in the Shoutbox chat on this main index page.

Recent content by sign of table

  1. sign of table

    Placement of Link's Awakening

    @First part of post about geography: Fair enough. True, however LA did much the same with LttP, AoL, and LoZ. Either enemies are evidence, or they aren't. That's the NoA version. NoA pulls stupid stuff like that, especially before Bill Trinen came around. The ONLY part of the NoJ manual that...
  2. sign of table

    Placement of Link's Awakening

    Use this map instead: Biased comparison is biased and leaves out obvious things. You're forgetting the lost woods to the north-west, the lake in the exact same spot to the north-east, the Biggoron dude is in the same spot as the egg, stream of water coming from the mountains leading to the...
  3. sign of table

    Placement of Link's Awakening

    The geography fits (I hate geography as I don't think it matters, but OoS does have a map that's very similar to Koholint), and fits the backstory of LA. There really isn't much more potential kinds of evidence. A few things that are shared between OoX and LA that LttP/LA doesn't have (I'm...
  4. sign of table

    Placement of Link's Awakening

    You mean when I said "but it's more difficult to know whether or not any of that evidence actually means anything, or whether it's just Capcom being wierd."? In my opinion, Capcom was intending to connect OoX to LA, but I have no idea if that's what Nintendo's intent is in the timeline. We know...
  5. sign of table

    Placement of Link's Awakening

    That's pretty circular. "was" was be a better word here. There are alternatives now with MORE proof than LttP/LA ever had. Why does it matter which one he resembles? Of course he's going to resemble LttP Ganon, do you expect it to resemble a Ganon that wasn't seen for like 7 years after the...
  6. sign of table

    The Evolution of the Timeline Debate

    Not exactly the opposite. The OoT=SW isn't completely disproven, as the same bull**** theory Lex has been spewing out is still possible, except now there is absolutely no reason to believe OoT=SW. Still possible, but now it's clearly just fanfic. By definitively disproving something, I mean...
  7. sign of table

    The Evolution of the Timeline Debate

    And it doesn't mean that the interview based on completely different and impossible things is evidence for the order of those two games. I'd just like to mention that very, very rarely is something definitively disproven. The SW is a perfect example of this. There is seriously no real reason to...
  8. sign of table

    Placement of Link's Awakening

    Oh, yay, I think this is the debate I've gotten the most warnings and infractions for cursing and such! :P Well OoX is the obvious contender to be a prequel to LA (if LttP isn't the prequel to LA). I'm 100% convinced that Capcom was intending to connect OoX to LA, but I'm unsure if that's what...
  9. sign of table

    The Evolution of the Timeline Debate

    Fair enough, that hasn't happened (as a fact). Look at the ingame evidence that went along with that intent. That ingame evidence is gone. Of course it went that way because the developers said so, but why did the developers say so? It definitely went along with in-game evidence. Then that...
  10. sign of table

    The Evolution of the Timeline Debate

    Besides the SW, like what? Do I need more than one example that fits the situation perfectly and answers your original question? I really think this example is conclusive enough to answer your original question. It does affect LttP-LoZ, by destroying all of the in-game evidence that supported...
  11. sign of table

    The Evolution of the Timeline Debate

    That all of the evidence that the 1998 quote was based on is DESTROYED AND NO MORE. Everything that the 1998 quote was based on is gone due to TWW. If all of the evidence that a quote was based on is destroyed by a later release, that is a clear sign of that quote being outdated and no longer...
  12. sign of table

    The Evolution of the Timeline Debate

    They've done that sort of thing in the past. Because there are alternatives now. Once again, I'm NOT saying that the alternatives are true, I'm saying that the 1998 interview is NOT proof of anything due to it being outdated because all of the evidence those quotes were based upon are gone...
  13. sign of table

    The Evolution of the Timeline Debate

    I'm not saying it does (maybe I didn't make that clear enough :P). I'm just saying that the 1998 interview is NOT proof for current intent. I don't put LttP and LoZ on seperate timelines, hell if ever I make a timeline I'll probably put LoZ after LttP. I just want to get rid of the idea that a...
  14. sign of table

    The Evolution of the Timeline Debate

    @Pinecove: Okay, fair enough, LoZ-LttP is very unlikely. However my point about the 1998 interview no longer being proof for LttP-LoZ still stands. It has nothing to do with the SW directly. However, it was always because of the SW that it couldn't be before LttP in 1991 and 1998 (when those...
  15. sign of table

    The Evolution of the Timeline Debate

    I think he's talking about the box. I haven't denied that. I'm saying that the in-game evidence that those things were based upon (IE the in-game reasons for WHY it had to go LttP-LoZ) were destroyed by TWW, which means that alternatives (like LoZ-LttP) were then possible, due to those quotes...
Top Bottom