DarkestLink
Darkest of all Dark Links
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2012
Finally and most importantly, LPs are for fun. No one is doing it to make money.
Not true.
If anyone is, they are defeating the purpose of LPs.
True.
Finally and most importantly, LPs are for fun. No one is doing it to make money.
If anyone is, they are defeating the purpose of LPs.
The fact that it's about the commentary and not the content is important.
*facepalm*
You're completely missing my point.
Well the commentary and video goes hand in hand, people want to see how others play the game while obviously listening to them and their reactions etc. Even though what separates the best LPers is the commentary style/quality, their videos wouldn't be the same without the visual aspect to relate to.I...disagree. If it were just about commentary, why not make a game review or a podcast? Much quicker. In fact, sometimes the commentary can really turn me off when it's not related to the gameplay at all. In fact, if it's just about the commentary, forget the LP entirely and just film yourself talking into your webcam.
Again, the gameplay is merely a backdrop - the stuff that facilitates the commentary getting through to the public. A stage play is all about the acting, right? So why have costumes, lights, hell even dialogue? Because it all melds together to get you the reaction you desire.I...disagree. If it were just about commentary, why not make a game review or a podcast? Much quicker. Actually, sometimes the commentary can really turn me off when it's not related to the gameplay at all. In fact, if it's just about the commentary, forget the LP entirely and just film yourself talking into your webcam.
Again, the gameplay is merely a backdrop - the stuff that facilitates the commentary getting through to the public. A stage play is all about the acting, right? So why have costumes, lights, hell even dialogue? Because it all melds together to get you the reaction you desire.
However they aren't merely just stealing the content, they are providing genuine entertainment, they are bringing multiple people to the site, a lot of LPers drive a lot of the views that YouTube gets. Plus the fact that they essentially advertise Nintendo games (free advertisement), due to the sheer accessibility of viewers being able to watch then it's easy for them to provide videos to the masses. I can guarantee that such LPers have benefited Nintendo in some kind of fashion through this "free advertising".They're still making money off of videos that have content they didn't make, though. The fact that they're commenting doesn't change that. I'll admit it would be kind of nice for Nintendo to SPLIT the profits, but it really doesn't matter either way.
Some LPers rely on this to support themselves. It is the same kind of thing.Nope, you're wrong. There's inherent difference. First of all, the only thing illegal about a fansite is the use of copyrighted images. Talking about the game is not illegal. So one tiny part like copyrighted images? That's silly to take the ad revenue from. Second: As you said it yourself, they would have no way to support themselves. We're talking a site that's paying it's way through ad revenue and hosts a large community of people working together and discussing the game.
Actually, no. Copyright law is not on Nintendo's side in this. Copyright law allows for fair use for the purposes of criticism, education, and commentary. Making the use of the copywritten content entirely legal.LPs? The entire thing is against copyright laws. If Ninty wanted to, they could shut down the LPs entirely. The whole thing is making money off of Nintendo's work. Furthermore, is anything really being put into LPs to deserve money? Not really, it's fairly simple. I did LPs before, it isn't worth getting paid, that's for sure. More than that, LPs don't need anything to support themselves, just the time it takes to make them. They are getting rewarded. Would it be unreasonable for Nintendo to say "all fan sites with copyrighted images need to give us the money they don't use to support the site"? No, it wouldn't; otherwise the fansite owners are making money off of Nintendo's games.
You need to understand, as do many people in this thread, that there are copyright laws for a reason. Nintendo has the right to enforce all of these laws as they please. Again, Nintendo could shut down fan sites and LPs entirely. They aren't. They're not evil, and they're well within their rights.
Actually, no. Copyright law is not on Nintendo's side in this. Copyright law allows for fair use for the purposes of criticism, education, and commentary. Making the use of the copywritten content entirely legal.
Some LPers rely on this to support themselves. It is the same kind of thing.
Actually, no. Copyright law is not on Nintendo's side in this. Copyright law allows for fair use for the purposes of criticism, education, and commentary. Making the use of the copywritten content entirely legal.
U.S. Copyright Office - Fair Use
Here you guys go. Commentary is legit. Who cares if it is lazy? On disc DLC is lazy. Releasing incomplete games is lazy. Hell, going to sleep on the job is lazy. There's no problem with commentary being added to the list. What, are you mad because the commentators make easier money than you do? Well...go grab a mic, a popular game, some capture equipment, and have a blast.