Alright, I know it may be too early for this, since this sort of thing threw me under the bus's spare tires before; but I've got some disorganized reads to share with the audience:
Doc: As far as I'm concerned, I think Doc's observations have the potential to be very astute, given nothing on our speculations can be confirmed at this point. I agree with LG that his posts have been good, and I'd like to think that he's a member of the town. I'd also say that upon observation I just conducted as I've been typing,
Frozen Chosen's observations seem to stem from a similar standing, which gives me a better understanding of LG's reads.
LG: I think there's a few things we can pick out from her wagon, but before I go into that, aside from her blatant joking around before the most recent posts, she's been in character as her usual no-nonsense self. As far as her wagon goes, I'd like to dissect it a bit.
Little Gumball (2)- Pendio, Timeless.
I'm not too concerned about Timeless and Johnny at this time, but I find Pendio's vote the most interesting since it was the most recent and took place after his brief discourse with Eduarda. Briefly recapping, he stated the following:
A lynch I disagree with? Definitely not. Would you?
That being said, at this early point in the game there is not exactly any player whose lynch I specifically disagree with, so at this time I could see myself joining any lynch in order to lynch someone. Later in the game however (when I have formed better opinions on all of the players) I should not be as easily persuaded.
You misunderstand what I meant. On day 1 (when I will most likely not have much of an opinion on anyone) I am fine with it. If I, however, have reason to trust the player who is getting lynched over other players, I will not lend a hand in it. Anyway, I imagine I will probably be willing to agree to help out lyachting most of the time. I just wanted to make it very clear that I am not guaranteed to definitely join a bandwagon only to lynch.
His overall semi-cautiousness I would argue fits his MO, and is representative of an independent mindset, especially in the former post. While I understand his line of thought in these responses, I became intrigued by his late vote on Gummy. What's the agenda here? (Especially since LG is a good player to have under contract with the town).
Last thoughts: I just caught up to this recent discourse on kokirion, and while I can sort of see where recent suspicion on him has stemmed, I don't know if I necessarily agree. He did note that he believed better targets outside of LG existed on this day. The only thing I'm somewhat perplexed by is his choosing to vote Jamie of the inactive crew, since Jamie can be a valuable asset. In contrast to this, Eduarda takes the safer route by going with RegalBryant. Perhaps I'm reading too much into this vote patter, but I find the dichotomy interesting based on bold/safe moves.
For now, I'm going to leave my vote on Sadia. I'm not entirely sold on the recent direction of the town yet, but at the same time, I can't say my vote on Sadia holds much water anyways. I mainly voted her since at the time of my vote, she had not posted yet. The only other thing I can say is that she joined on the consensus speculation train late in the game; however, I've been wrong about consensus patterns before, i.e. Patcat. This is all for now.
