I selected other (please specify). The reason for this being that they are as good as each other, They both have downsides.
Pokemon: Pokemon has one major advantage over Zelda, And thats with the newer Verisions, That being Competitive Battling. In the newer one this has gotten much easier with even more pokemon to choose from and also Wifi. Wifi makes battling easier and also means I can battle people from around the world. Also you never going to make a team which can't be defeated, There is always a team out there that can beat yours.
Zelda: Zelda only has 1 game that I am aware of in which you can do fight against others, That being Phantom Hourglass, Although this can be really fun, Mainly for travelling, It does get annoying when someone camp's you base so you can hardly ever score major points, If you score points at all. Unlike where in Pokemon if you have a team that does bad you can either make adjustments or do a complete make over. Unlike if PH where if your bad, Your bad.
Pokemon: The major fault with many of you is that Pokemon doesn't change enough from each game for your liking, Many of you only like up to Pokemon Gold and then you have decided that you don't like the newer generations, Even though I disagree I also agree with this statement, Pokemon Gold was the best, I just don't like the Starting pokemon in that game. I still like the newer games though. I like being able to EV train and make different Pokemon be able to give out surprises.
Zelda: Here is where Zelda excels, Even though it is based on the same 4-5 things is never gets old, The items change and add twists to it, The Temple's are always fun to do and never get boring. Even though there is no way to make your fighting style different really it is still fun. There are also many challenges that you can try on Zelda's. In terms of some Zelda's they get very hard to pull of. Like 3-heart challenge, Minimalist runs and others. Although they get easier the newer the games seem to be they are still quite hard to do.
