Spoiler Timeline Theories - Page 3

Pinecove · 11-10-2009, 07:39 PM

Quote:

Of course it's not Canon, Tetra's Trackers is just a spin-off multiplayer mini-game.

I try to take nearly everything as Canon.......I guess this is impossible to work though.

Zemen125 · 11-10-2009, 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pinecove

I try to take nearly everything as Canon.......I guess this is impossible to work though.

So then you believe that the CD-i Zeldas are canon and TRR is canon then?

Sign of Justice · 11-10-2009, 10:41 PM

^IIRC Pinecove does believe that TRR is canon.

Or atleast he did for a while.

Pinecove · 11-13-2009, 03:17 PM

I still do.

I did some research on Vanpool and they've been put with Nintendo for quite a few games actually.

The CDi games I don't take as Canon. THAT is taking things to far.

Sign of Justice · 11-14-2009, 03:27 AM

^Does it matter if they made games with Nintendo? Miyamoto and Aonuma had NOTHING to do with it, and the producer even admitted that he/she had NEVER played Zelda.

Yeah this game is most definitely extremely timeline relevant

Pinecove · 11-15-2009, 11:04 AM

^So what if it is or isn't?

That's like saying MM doesn't count in a timeline because it isn't timeline relevant.

And yes it does matter that they made the games with Nintendo. Impossible was claiming that Vanpool had NO RELATION with Nintendo, when infact they did.

Sign of Justice · 11-15-2009, 08:49 PM

^I don't care what Impossible claimed.

I care about what I am currently claiming.

There is no reason that this game deserves a timeline spot, or is timeline relevant. Aonuma had nothing to do with it and the producer had never played Zelda.

Zemen125 · 11-16-2009, 11:41 AM

I'm going to have to agree with SoJ on this one. Aonuma, the man in charge of timeline affairs, had nothing to do with the game. It should be clear that the game is not timeline relevant with just that information alone. Pair that with the fact that the producer of the game had never played a Zelda game before, then you got yourself a non-canon game. How can we trust what the game says compared to other games when the person overlooking that game had never played a Zelda game before?

11-10-2009, 10:41 PM	#33
Sign of Justice Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Hyrule and Azeroth Age: 14 Posts: 425	^IIRC Pinecove does believe that TRR is canon. Or atleast he did for a while. __________________ Mostly gone 'til the 16th of September. (might be on a bit, but I'll have very, very limited access to a computer/internet)

11-13-2009, 03:17 PM	#34
Pinecove Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 154	I still do. I did some research on Vanpool and they've been put with Nintendo for quite a few games actually. The CDi games I don't take as Canon. THAT is taking things to far. __________________

11-14-2009, 03:27 AM	#35
Sign of Justice Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Hyrule and Azeroth Age: 14 Posts: 425	^Does it matter if they made games with Nintendo? Miyamoto and Aonuma had NOTHING to do with it, and the producer even admitted that he/she had NEVER played Zelda. Yeah this game is most definitely extremely timeline relevant __________________ Mostly gone 'til the 16th of September. (might be on a bit, but I'll have very, very limited access to a computer/internet)

11-15-2009, 11:04 AM	#36
Pinecove Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 154	^So what if it is or isn't? That's like saying MM doesn't count in a timeline because it isn't timeline relevant. And yes it does matter that they made the games with Nintendo. Impossible was claiming that Vanpool had NO RELATION with Nintendo, when infact they did. __________________

11-15-2009, 08:49 PM	#37
Sign of Justice Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Hyrule and Azeroth Age: 14 Posts: 425	^I don't care what Impossible claimed. I care about what I am currently claiming. There is no reason that this game deserves a timeline spot, or is timeline relevant. Aonuma had nothing to do with it and the producer had never played Zelda. __________________ Mostly gone 'til the 16th of September. (might be on a bit, but I'll have very, very limited access to a computer/internet)

11-16-2009, 11:41 AM	#38
Zemen125 BOOM...ROASTED!! Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Illinois Age: 20 Posts: 1,527	I'm going to have to agree with SoJ on this one. Aonuma, the man in charge of timeline affairs, had nothing to do with the game. It should be clear that the game is not timeline relevant with just that information alone. Pair that with the fact that the producer of the game had never played a Zelda game before, then you got yourself a non-canon game. How can we trust what the game says compared to other games when the person overlooking that game had never played a Zelda game before? __________________ "The winds echo of a legend... ...a legend of a boy clothed in green"