Search results for query: *

We see the adult versions of characters celebrating, then we see that Link is back in a slightly altered version of his own timeline. We can tell that it’s a different timeline because it’s now before Ganondorf attacked, not after. Not to mention, if it were the same timeline than the Door of...

The simple fact that we not only see both timelines play out in OoTs credits, but also the fact that we never see a 2nd Link during the adult potion of OoT is proof enough that it has to be 2 seperate timelines. The game itself makes a point that Link going back in time for the final time means...

The entire point of WW in canon was to let go of past mistakes, and that is exactly what they did in ST. The fact that there’s another conflict makes literally no difference because “New” Hyrule is ultimately a completely different place, that definitively does have a different government. It...

The split time was made before the idea of a sequel to OoT was even thought about. It wasn’t created to “explain” anything. He accepted the life of a hero. That’s completely different from being considered a hero afterwards. Because it’s completely unheard of for there to be more than one...

Literally the entire point of the ending of OoT was that there was a split timeline. Literally the entire catalyst of WW was the fact that there was a split timeline. Literally the entire reason MM can exist is because there is a split timeline. This is not a debatable point, its an objective...