Search results for query: *

You're all posting too fast for me to keep up, so I need to address this before I continue reading: Several of us had misgivings when Kitsu and Rep were brought on as administrators because we felt that if they had been up for the mod rank we would have rejected them, so we wanted a clear...

I reversed the infraction. From the available evidence (Kitsu did provide a good amount of evidence to the mod team, which should have also been communicated to DM in the infraction message), I see baiting from both parties, but not enough to warrant an infraction. The reversed infraction will...

No one's trying to silence you from opposing anyone. Only from making baseless accusations.

Banned users can click the "Contact Us" link at the bottom of any page and fill out the form. The user should select the "Account Problem" option and explain his or her case. I'll receive an email and can follow up from there, provided the user provides a valid email address.

I disagree. I'm not really concerned with the content of the video except that it was presented in a disrespectful way toward another member. More accurately, the framing of the matter. I don't care if someone has the worst possible intentions toward DGN. If he or she is contributing positively...

What I'm trying to say is that it wasn't removed because someone felt offended. As I said, I understand that Kitsu didn't mean any offense.

Please consider that there's a difference between not listening and not doing what you want me to do. I think that confusion has contributed a lot to the assumptions that mods ignore people. I was personally offended by the video in the blog (I didn't even want to watch it, I looked up lyrics...

You're right, it's not, and it has been dealt with accordingly, separately from your case. Retaliation doesn't justify your actions, in the same way that instigation doesn't justify retaliation. They're two separate behaviors that must be judged in regard to how they affect the community, not...

Jokes are fine, even satire's fine. But not at the expense of another member. If you had made that blog at any other time, or given it a more original title, there wouldn't be a problem. But the way you framed it devalued 43's blog and 43 himself, whether you intended it to or not. We value all...

"Good for you" is almost always interpreted as sarcastic or passive-aggressive. I get that you were trying to say that his point was irrelevant (and it was), but given that it's an MD thread, you should have simply explained that his point was irrelevant. The infraction wasn't for insulting or...

I've subscribed to this thread, so I'll read any complaints posted here. Of course I want to stress that there are other means of contacting us. This thread should help those who have lost faith in those other means, and hopefully we can eventually build back enough trust so we don't need this...